Gcore named a Leader in the GigaOm Radar for AI Infrastructure!Get the report
  1. Home
  2. Developers
  3. 10 Common Web Security Vulnerabilities

10 Common Web Security Vulnerabilities

  • By Gcore
  • July 18, 2023
  • 12 min read
10 Common Web Security Vulnerabilities

Companies today rely heavily on websites and web applications to communicate with their employees, partners, and clients across different locations and time zones. However, this increase in digital communication comes with an increased risk of cybercrime. It is crucial for businesses to understand the potential web security vulnerabilities in their IT systems and take proactive measures to safeguard sensitive assets. This post provides an overview of cybercrime, and then explores the top 10 web security vulnerabilities of which you should be aware in detail.

What Are Web Security Vulnerabilities?

Web security vulnerabilities are weaknesses or misconfigurations in a web application that an attacker can exploit to gain unauthorized access or perform unauthorized, malicious actions. These vulnerabilities act like open windows in a house, enabling unauthorized access. Web security vulnerabilities can exist in various parts of a web application, including the server, host, or application software itself. Web applications interact with users across various networks, making them attractive targets for hackers.

When web application vulnerabilities are exploited, businesses are at risk of cybercrime, meaning that potential threats exist to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their data and services. For example, these attacks often intend to steal valuable sensitive information, such as personal data, intellectual property, or financial details, and comprise the data stored in the system as a whole. Cybercrime can result in fraud (like identity theft,) holding businesses to ransom for their data, or undermining trust in a service provider.

To grasp the gravity of web security vulnerabilities, we need to consider three key factors: exploitability, detectability, and potential impact.

Exploitability

Exploitability refers to the level of ease with which an attacker can take advantage of a security vulnerability. At one end of the spectrum, an attack may only require a web browser, making it highly exploitable. At the other end, advanced programming skills and tools are necessary, resulting in low exploitability.

Detectability

Detectability plays a vital role in identifying security threats. The higher the detectability, the easier it is to recognize a vulnerability. Information displayed in the URL, forms, or error messages provides clues that aid in vulnerability identification, offering a high level of detectability. Conversely, low detectability involves delving into the source code, demanding advanced knowledge and expertise. For example, a vulnerable web application that leaks sensitive user data via a poorly implemented authentication mechanism can be easily identified through error messages or anomalies in the URL structure.

Potential Impact

Assessing the potential impact or damage caused by a security vulnerability is key. A highly impactful vulnerability can result in a complete system crash, leading to significant disruptions and potential data breaches. Consider an SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate database queries. Exploiting this vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, data theft, or even the modification of critical information, causing severe consequences. On the other hand, a vulnerability with low impact may not cause any damage at all.

By understanding exploitability, detectability, and potential impact, organizations can effectively evaluate the risks associated with web security vulnerabilities. Armed with this understanding, appropriate measures can be implemented in a timely manner to mitigate these risks.

10 Common Web Security Vulnerabilities

To effectively address web security, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the common vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers. You can only fix what you can first identify! These vulnerabilities often stem from flaws in the design, implementation, or configuration of web applications.

#1 Broken Access Control

How broken access control can be exploited in a cyber attack

Broken access control is a critical security vulnerability that occurs when users can access data or resources that they should not have permission to access. This breach in access control can arise due to various factors, including poor permissions management, weak authentication mechanisms, or misconfigured security controls. Let’s look at each in turn.

Poor Permissions Management

Poor permissions management is a common cause of broken access control. When permissions are not properly configured, users may gain access to sensitive data or resources that should be restricted. This can happen when access privileges are inaccurately assigned, leading to unintended exposure of sensitive information. Inconsistencies in permission settings across different parts of an application can also contribute to this vulnerability, allowing unauthorized users to bypass access restrictions.

Weak Authentication Mechanisms

Weak authentication mechanisms play a significant role in broken access control. If authentication mechanisms are not robust, attackers can exploit these weaknesses to gain unauthorized access to a system. Weak passwords, lack of multi-factor authentication (MFA,) or ineffective session management can all contribute to the vulnerability. For example, if a user chooses a weak password or if password complexity requirements are not enforced, it becomes easier for attackers to guess or crack passwords and gain unauthorized access to user accounts.

Misconfigured Security Controls

Misconfigured security controls is another web security vulnerability that can lead to broken access control. When security controls are not properly configured, attackers may find ways to bypass these measures and gain unauthorized access. This can occur when security configurations are left at default settings, which might not provide adequate protection. Misconfigurations in firewall rules, access control lists, or other security components can also create loopholes that allow unauthorized access.

Mitigating Broken Access Control

Mitigating broken access control requires implementing proper access control mechanisms, strong authentication practices, and vigilant security configurations. Access permissions should be carefully defined and regularly audited to ensure that users can only access the data and resources they are authorized to. Robust authentication mechanisms, such as strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, and secure session management, should be implemented to prevent unauthorized access. Additionally, security controls and configurations should be reviewed and updated regularly to address any vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.

#2 Cryptographic Failures

An attacker can gain access to a users’ credentials across multiple websites by exploiting cryptographic failures in an app to access password data

A cryptographic failure refers to a web security vulnerability through which the implementation or usage of cryptographic measures fails to provide the intended level of security, which can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data that the cryptography was supposed to protect. Cryptographic failures pose a significant security risk when sensitive data is not properly encrypted or when cryptographic keys are mishandled. These vulnerabilities can result in severe consequences, including data breaches and identity theft.

Insecure Storage of Cryptographic Information

One prevalent cryptographic vulnerability is the insecure storage of cryptographic information. This vulnerability arises when sensitive data is stored in an insecure manner, leaving it vulnerable to exploitation. For instance, sensitive data like user credentials, profile information, health details, and credit card information all require protection. However, if this data is improperly stored without adequate encryption or proper hashing techniques, it becomes an attractive target for malicious actors.

Consider a scenario where a web application stores user passwords in plain text or uses weak encryption algorithms. In the event of a security breach, attackers can gain unauthorized access to the application’s database and easily retrieve and exploit the stored passwords. This can have devastating consequences, including unauthorized account access, identity theft, and the compromise of other systems or services where users reuse passwords.

The implications of this web security vulnerability are far reaching. Exploiting this vulnerability allows attackers to steal or modify weakly protected data, leading to identity theft, credit card fraud, and other criminal activities. The primary vulnerable object in this scenario is the application database where the data is stored. Such activities can cause financial losses, damage reputations, and even result in legal consequences.

#3 Injection Flaws

Injection flaws happen when an attacker injects malicious data into a command or query that is then processed by an application. These flaws occur when an application sends untrusted data to an interpreter or a service without properly validating or sanitizing the input first. The malicious data can lead the interpreter or service to execute unintended commands, leading to data loss, corruption, or unauthorized access.

SQL Injection

SQL injection is a widespread security vulnerability that occurs when a hacker injects malicious SQL code into a web application, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive data or control over the affected system. This type of attack poses a significant threat, often resulting in the compromise of e-commerce websites and the illegal retrieval of valuable information such as user details, credit card data, and social security numbers.

To safeguard against SQL injection, ensure that your SQL database is appropriately configured. Employ best practices such as using parameterized queries or prepared statements, as they help prevent attackers from manipulating SQL statements. Regularly update your devices with the latest security patches, as software updates often address known vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers.

Other Injection Vulnerabilities

Injection vulnerabilities are not limited to SQL injection. Other forms of injection vulnerabilities, such as LDAP injection or Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) can also pose significant risks. To protect against these types of vulnerabilities, it is crucial to implement input filtering and validation mechanisms. Any untrusted input received by your application should undergo thorough filtering, preferably using a whitelist approach. This ensures that only expected and validated input is accepted, effectively preventing attackers from injecting malicious code or scripts. Relying solely on blacklists can be challenging to configure effectively and may be circumvented by skilled attackers.

To mitigate the risk of injection vulnerabilities, implement robust user authentication tools, Strong authentication mechanisms (such as enforcing complex passwords and utilizing multi-factor authentication) to help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, and restrict access privileges based on the principle of least privilege. The latter ensures that users only have access to the resources they require to perform their tasks, reducing the potential impact of an attack.

#4 Insecure Direct Object References

Insecure direct object references (IDOR) vulnerabilities arise when a web application exposes internal objects, such as files, directories, or database keys, through URLs or form parameters. These vulnerabilities stem from blindly trusting user input, which can lead to unintended exposure of sensitive information. Exposure of the internal objects can enable attackers to gain unauthorized access to other objects that were not initially exposed, and potentially compromise the application’s data integrity.

Examples and Implications of IDOR Vulnerabilities

The implications of IDOR vulnerabilities are significant, as attackers can exploit them to access unauthorized internal objects, manipulate data, or compromise the overall security of the application. For example, consider a download module that allows file downloads without proper authorization checks. If this module exposes the file path within the URL, an attacker could modify the URL to access other system files that should be restricted. This can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, compromising the confidentiality and integrity of the application.

Similarly, insecure direct object references in password reset functions can be exploited by attackers to manipulate privileged accounts. If the password reset functionality exposes user account information within the URL or form parameters, an attacker could tamper with the values to gain unauthorized access to privileged accounts. This can lead to unauthorized actions, data breaches, and potential damage to the overall security of the application.

#5 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Depiction of a legitimate HTTP request from an attacker that includes an SSRF payload, which triggers malicious requests across connected networks

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) is a specific type of attack that exploits a distinct vulnerability. SSRF vulnerabilities occur when a web application fails to properly validate user-provided URLs when accessing remote resources. Attackers can manipulate vulnerable applications to send crafted requests to specific URLs, bypassing access controls like firewalls that would typically block direct connections to the target URL but grant access to the compromised web application.

One case of an SSRF vulnerability is the unauthorized retrieval of sensitive data from an internal database through a vulnerable web application. By carefully exploiting the SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can deceive the application into making requests to internal URLs, ultimately gaining access to confidential information. Proper input validation and robust security measures are essential for web applications to mitigate the risk of SSRF attacks.

One recent example highlighting the impact of SSRF vulnerabilities is the Capital One hack. In this incident, 140,000 Social Security numbers and 80,000 bank account numbers were stolen. The attack exploited an SSRF vulnerability that allowed the attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. Remarkably, the incident remained undetected for four months, emphasizing the significance of identifying and addressing SSRF vulnerabilities promptly and effectively.

#6 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Diagram depicting how cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks work across multiple tabs in the same browser by exploiting a users’ one-time log-in

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) is an attack in which a malicious entity deceives a user’s browser into performing actions on a trusted website without their knowledge or consent. This type of attack occurs when the user is already authenticated on the targeted site. By forging a request with the user’s session cookie and other authentication information, the attacker can carry out unauthorized actions, potentially compromising the victim’s account.

The implications of a CSRF vulnerability are severe. Attackers can manipulate user profile information, change status updates, or even create new users on behalf of administrators. Certain objects within a web application, such as user profile pages, user account forms, and business transaction pages, are particularly vulnerable to CSRF attacks.

CSRF in E-commerce

To understand the potential impact of a CSRF vulnerability, consider a scenario where a victim is logged into a frequently used e-commerce website. Unbeknownst to them, simply browsing the web without first logging out can enable a cybercriminal to trick the browser into making purchases on a different website they visit, without their consent. By embedding malicious code into that website, the hacker can utilize the victim’s saved payment information and complete a purchase using their account.

#7 Outdated or Vulnerable Web Application Components

An attacker can use vulnerable and outdated internal components to carry out a cyber attack

The use of outdated or vulnerable components in web applications can pose significant security risks. In recent years, the emergence of supply chain vulnerabilities has magnified these concerns. Threat actors deliberately inject malicious or vulnerable code into widely used libraries and third-party dependencies, creating a potential entry point for attackers. Organizations that lack visibility into their external code and fail to promptly apply necessary security updates expose themselves to significant risks.

Real-world incidents have demonstrated the dire consequences of neglecting to update third-party software. For instance, outdated WordPress plugins that remained unpatched in environments for prolonged periods led to severe security breaches. Attackers exploited these vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access and compromise entire systems, resulting in data breaches, service disruptions, and reputational damage.

It is essential to recognize that software development goes beyond initial deployment. It requires meticulous documentation, rigorous testing, and effective maintenance plans, particularly when utilizing third-party or open-source components. Proactive steps should be taken to assess web applications for vulnerable and outdated components during the maintenance and deployment stages of development.

#8 Security Misconfigurations

Security misconfigurations are when a component of a system is not set up correctly, leading to potential vulnerabilities that can be exploited by cyberattackers, exposing organizations to risks of unauthorized access and data breaches, also allowing the attacker to gather critical information about the application for further attacks.

Alarming industry reports indicate that up to 95% of security breaches stem from human error, implementing proper security configurations incorrectly. This highlights the critical role that comprehensive security practices play in preventing incidents. One prevalent cause of security misconfigurations is the failure to regularly update and patch systems, frameworks, and components, leaving them exposed to known vulnerabilities.

Implications of Security Misconfigurations

The implications of security misconfigurations are severe, as they provide attackers with opportunities to identify the underlying technology, access sensitive information, and potentially compromise the entire system. For example, leaving an application server’s admin console with default settings and unchanged passwords creates an easily exploitable entry point for unauthorized access. Similarly, enabling directory listing on the server inadvertently exposes valuable files and directories to potential attackers.

#9 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards

Unvalidated redirects and forwards (URF) present security vulnerabilities in web applications. These vulnerabilities arise when applications redirect or forward users to URLs supplied by the users themselves. Attackers exploit URF vulnerabilities to redirect users to malicious sites, leading to data theft, malware installation, and other harmful actions. These vulnerabilities occur when developers fail to properly validate user input, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into URLs or query strings.

Examples of URF

Improper configuration of web applications can also contribute to URF vulnerabilities. For example, the use of insecure random number generators in web applications can facilitate the manipulation of URLs or query strings by attackers. They can predict and manipulate these parameters, redirecting users to malicious sites without their knowledge or consent.

To give another example, imagine a website’s redirect.php module accepts a URL as a parameter, which can be manipulated to deceive users with seemingly safe links that actually lead to malicious destinations. Users may unknowingly provide sensitive information or fall victim to malware or phishing attacks. Implementing input validation and strict rules for user-supplied URLs can mitigate URF vulnerabilities, ensuring user safety and protecting against unauthorized redirects.

#10 Software and Data Integrity Failures

How attackers can use software failures to exploit legitimate users and undermine the code of an application

Software and data integrity failures refer to vulnerabilities in web security that take place when the integrity of critical data and software updates is not verified before they are added to the delivery pipeline. These failures can result from faulty assumptions, outdated software, insufficient vulnerability scanning, erroneous input validation, missing patches, missing unit tests, or insecure component configurations.

In today’s agile software development landscape, where rapid updates are common, the lack of strict integrity checks poses a serious risk. These failures can have far-reaching impacts, including unauthorized information disclosure, system compromise, and the insertion of malicious code. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities by injecting malicious inputs, which can impact various stages of the deployment pipeline.

Insecure Deserialization

Insecure deserialization is a common manifestation of software and data integrity failures. Attackers can tamper with input payloads during deserialization, coercing the application to execute malicious code or alter its logic. Another example is the reliance on unvalidated cookies. Applications often use cookies for security controls, but without proper integrity checking, hackers can modify cookies to supply malicious input, perform injection attacks, or bypass authentication.

What Are the Repercussions of Web Security Vulnerabilities?

Cybercrime can have severe consequences for businesses that become victims. The repercussions may include damage to the company’s reputation, loss of customer trust, financial losses, and potential legal issues. It is crucial to understand the gravity and type of these threats and take proactive steps to mitigate them.

How Can You Protect Your Business Against Web Security Vulnerabilities?

Implementing web security measures is essential to reduce vulnerabilities and defend against potential attacks. Waiting until a breach occurs is not an effective strategy. On average, it takes 287 days to detect and contain a single data breach. Adopting a proactive approach to data protection is crucial to save time, optimize resources, and safeguard valuable company assets.

Begin by conducting a comprehensive web security assessment. This assessment should encompass evaluation of vulnerabilities in your systems, networks, and applications, focusing on areas including data storage, access controls, encryption, and employee awareness. By identifying and addressing these vulnerabilities, you can enhance your overall security posture and protect your business from cybercrimes.

Conclusion

As organizations embrace the accelerating power of web-based communication, it is essential to prioritize the security of the valuable information held therein. By understanding and addressing common web security vulnerabilities, organizations can fortify their defenses and safeguard against online threats.

The path to effective cybersecurity involves taking proactive measures to counter the ten common web security vulnerabilities discussed here. Examples of such proactive cybersecurity measures include regular security updates and patching, robust authentication mechanisms, secure coding practices, thorough input validation, strict configuration management, and comprehensive security testing. Staying informed about emerging threats, promoting security awareness among employees, and maintaining a culture of vigilance are vital for maintaining a strong defense against evolving web security risks. By prioritizing web security, organizations can protect their sensitive data, maintain customer trust, and preserve their reputation in an increasingly interconnected digital landscape.

At Gcore, we understand the critical importance of choosing the right cybersecurity tools to protect your digital assets. Gcore’s Web Application Security is a comprehensive, all-in-one solution. It includes a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with a built-in ML mechanism that continuously checks reliability and identifies potential vulnerabilities. Let us take care of your web application security so you can focus on your business goals.

Related articles

Query your cloud with natural language: A developer’s guide to Gcore MCP

What if you could ask your infrastructure questions and get real answers?With Gcore’s open-source implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), now you can. MCP turns generative AI into an agent that understands your infrastructure, responds to your queries, and takes action when you need it to.In this post, we’ll demo how to use MCP to explore and inspect your Gcore environment just by prompting, to list resources, check audit logs, and generate cost reports. We’ll also walk through a fun bonus use case: provisioning infrastructure and exporting it to Terraform.What is MCP and why do devs love it?Originally developed by Anthropic, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard that turns language models into agents that interact with structured tools: APIs, CLIs, or internal systems. Gcore’s implementation makes this protocol real for our customers.With MCP, you can:Ask questions about your infrastructureList, inspect, or filter cloud resourcesView cost data, audit logs, or deployment metadataExport configs to TerraformChain multi-step operations via natural languageGcore MCP removes friction from interacting with your infrastructure. Instead of wiring together scripts or context-switching across dashboards and CLIs, you can just…ask.That means:Faster debugging and auditsMore accessible infra visibilityFewer repetitive setup tasksBetter team collaborationBecause it’s open source, backed by the Gcore Python SDK, you can plug it into other APIs, extend tool definitions, or even create internal agents tailored to your stack. Explore the GitHub repo for yourself.What can you do with it?This isn’t just a cute chatbot. Gcore MCP connects your cloud to real-time insights. Here are some practical prompts you can use right away.Infrastructure inspection“List all VMs running in the Frankfurt region”“Which projects have over 80% GPU utilization?”“Show all volumes not attached to any instance”Audit and cost analysis“Get me the API usage for the last 24 hours”“Which users deployed resources in the last 7 days?”“Give a cost breakdown by region for this month”Security and governance“Show me firewall rules with open ports”“List all active API tokens and their scopes”Experimental automation“Create a secure network in Tokyo, export to Terraform, then delete it”We’ll walk through that last one in the full demo below.Full video demoWatch Gcore’s AI Software Engineer, Algis Dumbris, walk through setting up MCP on your machine and show off some use cases. If you prefer reading, we’ve broken down the process step-by-step below.Step-by-step walkthroughThis section maps to the video and shows exactly how to replicate the workflow locally.1. Install MCP locally (0:00–1:28)We use uv to isolate the environment and pull the project directly from GitHub.curl -Ls https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh uvx add gcore-mcp-server https://github.com/G-Core/gcore-mcp-server Requirements:PythonGcore account + API keyTool config file (from the repo)2. Set up your environment (1:28–2:47)Configure two environment variables:GCORE_API_KEY for authGCORE_TOOLS to define what the agent can access (e.g., regions, instances, costs, etc.)Soon, tool selection will be automatic, but today you can define your toolset in YAML or JSON.3. Run a basic query (3:19–4:11)Prompt:“Find the Gcore region closest to Antalya.”The agent maps this to a regions.list call and returns: IstanbulNo need to dig through docs or write an API request.4. Provision, export, and clean up (4:19–5:32)This one’s powerful if you’re experimenting with CI/CD or infrastructure-as-code.Prompt:“Create a secure network in Tokyo. Export to Terraform. Then clean up.”The agent:Provisions the networkExports it to Terraform formatDestroys the resources afterwardYou get usable .tf output with no manual scripting. Perfect for testing, prototyping, or onboarding.Gcore: always building for developersTry it now:Clone the repoInstall UVX + configure your environmentStart prompting your infrastructureOpen issues, contribute tools, or share your use casesThis is early-stage software, and we’re just getting started. Expect more tools, better UX, and deeper integrations soon.Watch how easy it is to deploy an inference instance with Gcore

How to protect login pages with Gcore WAAP

Exposed login pages are a common vulnerability across web applications. Attackers often use automated tools to guess credentials in brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks, probe for login behavior to exploit session or authentication logic, or overload your infrastructure with fake requests.Without specific rules for login-related traffic, your application might miss these threats or apply overly broad protections that disrupt real users. Fortunately, Gcore WAAP makes it easy to defend these sensitive endpoints without touching your application code.In this guide, we’ll show you how to use WAAP’s custom rule engine to identify login traffic and apply protections like CAPTCHA to reduce risk, block automated abuse, and maintain a smooth experience for legitimate users. We’ve also included a complete video walkthrough from Gcore’s Security Presales Engineer, Michal Zalewski.Video walkthroughHere’s Gcore’s Michal Zalewski giving a full walkthrough of the steps in this article.Step 1: Access your WAAP configurationGo to portal.gcore.com and log in.Navigate to WAAP in the sidebar. If you’re not yet a WAAP user, it costs just $26/month.Select the resource that hosts your login form; for example, gcore.zalewski.cloud.Step 2: Create a custom ruleIn the main panel of your selected resource, go to WAAP Rules.Click Add Custom Rule in the upper-right corner.Step 3: Define the login page URLIdentify the login endpoint you want to protect:Use tools like Burp Suite or the "Inspect" feature in your browser to verify the login page URL.In Burp Suite, use the Proxy tab, or in the browser, check the Network tab to inspect a login request.Look for the path (e.g., /login.php) and HTTP method (POST).In the custom rule setup:Enter the URL (e.g., /login.php).Tag the request using a predefined tag. Select Login Page.Step 4: Name and save the ruleProvide a name for the rule, such as “Login Page URL”, and save it.Step 5: Add a CAPTCHA challenge ruleTo protect the login page from automated abuse:Create a new custom rule.Name it something like “Login Page Challenge”.Under Conditions, select the previously created Login Page tag.Set the Action to CAPTCHA.Save the rule.Step 6: Test the protectionReturn to your browser and turn off any proxy tools.Refresh the login page.You should now be challenged with a CAPTCHA each time the login page loads.Once the CAPTCHA is completed successfully, users can log in as usual.Monitor, adapt, and alertAfter deployment:Track rate limit trigger frequencyMonitor WAAP logs for anomaly detectionRotate exemptions or thresholds based on live behaviorFor analytics, refer to the WAAP analytics documentation.Bonus tips for hardened protectionCombine with bot protection: Enable WAAP’s bot mitigation to identify headless browsers and automation tools like Puppeteer or Selenium. See our bot protection docs for setup instructions.Customize 429 responses: Replace default error pages with branded messages or a fallback action. Consider including a support link or CAPTCHA challenge. Check out our response pages documentation for more details.Use geo or ASN exceptions: Whitelist trusted locations or block known bot-heavy ASNs if your audience is localized.Automate it: optional API and Terraform supportTeams with IaC pipelines or security automation workflows might want to automate login page protection with rate limiting. This keeps your WAAP config version-controlled and repeatable.You can use the WAAP API or Terraform to:Create or update rulesRotate session keys or thresholdsExport logs for auditingExplore the WAAP API documentation and WAAP Terraform provider documentation for more details.Stop abuse before it starts with GcoreLogin pages are high-value targets, but they don’t have to be high risk. With Gcore WAAP, setting up robust defenses takes just a few minutes. By tagging login traffic and applying challenge rules like CAPTCHA, you can reduce automated attack risk without sacrificing user experience.As your application grows, revisit your WAAP rules regularly to adapt to new threats, add behavior-based detection, and fine-tune your protective layers. For more advanced configurations, check out our documentation or reach out to Gcore support.Get WAAP today for just $26/month

3 underestimated security risks of AI workloads and how to overcome them

3 underestimated security risks of AI workloads and how to overcome them

Artificial intelligence workloads introduce a fundamentally different security landscape for engineering and security teams. Unlike traditional applications, AI systems must protect not just endpoints and networks, but also training data pipelines, feature stores, model repositories, and inference APIs. Each phase of the AI life cycle presents distinct attack vectors that adversaries can exploit to corrupt model behavior, extract proprietary logic, or manipulate downstream outputs.In this article, we uncover three security vulnerabilities of AI workloads and explain how developers and MLOps teams can overcome them. We also look at how investing in your AI security can save time and money, explore the challenges that lie ahead for AI security, and offer a simplified way to protect your AI workloads with Gcore.Risk #1: data poisoningData poisoning is a targeted attack on the integrity of AI systems, where malicious actors subtly inject corrupted or manipulated data into training pipelines. The result is a model that behaves unpredictably, generates biased or false outputs, or embeds hidden logic that can be triggered post-deployment. This can undermine business-critical applications—from fraud detection and medical diagnostics to content moderation and autonomous decision-making.For developers, the stakes are high: poisoned models are hard to detect once deployed, and even small perturbations in training data can have system-wide consequences. Luckily, you can take a few steps to mitigate against data poisoning and then implement zero-trust AI to further protect your workloads.Mitigation and hardeningRestrict dataset access using IAM, RBAC, or identity-aware proxies.Store all datasets in versioned, signed, and hashed formats.Validate datasets with automated schema checks, label distribution scans, and statistical outlier detection before training.Track data provenance with metadata logs and checksums.Block training runs if datasets fail predefined data quality gates.Integrate data validation scripts into CI/CD pipelines pre-training.Enforce zero-trust access policies for data ingestion services.Solution integration: zero-trust AIImplement continuous authentication and authorization for each component interacting with data (e.g., preprocessing scripts, training jobs).Enable real-time threat detection during training using runtime security tools.Automate incident response triggers for unexpected file access or data source changes.Risk #2: adversarial attacksAdversarial attacks manipulate model inputs in subtle ways that trick AI systems into making incorrect or dangerous decisions. These perturbations—often imperceptible to humans—can cause models to misclassify images, misinterpret speech, or misread sensor data. In high-stakes environments like facial recognition, autonomous vehicles, or fraud detection, these failures can result in security breaches, legal liabilities, or physical harm.For developers, the threat is real: even state-of-the-art models can be easily fooled without adversarial hardening. The good news? You can make your models more robust by combining defensive training techniques, input sanitization, and secure API practices. While encrypted inference doesn’t directly block adversarial manipulation, it ensures that sensitive inference data stays protected even if attackers attempt to probe the system.Mitigation and hardeningUse adversarial training frameworks like CleverHans or IBM ART to expose models to perturbed inputs during training.Apply input sanitization layers (e.g., JPEG re-encoding, blurring, or noise filters) before data reaches the model.Implement rate limiting and authentication on inference APIs to block automated adversarial probing.Use model ensembles or randomized smoothing to improve resilience to small input perturbations.Log and analyze input-output patterns to detect high-variance or abnormal responses.Test models regularly against known attack vectors using robustness evaluation tools.Solution integration: encrypted inferenceWhile encryption doesn't prevent adversarial inputs, it does mean that input data and model responses remain confidential and protected from observation or tampering during inference.Run inference in trusted environments like Intel SGX or AWS Nitro Enclaves to protect model and data integrity.Use homomorphic encryption or SMPC to process encrypted data without exposing sensitive input.Ensure that all intermediate and output data is encrypted at rest and in transit.Deploy access policies that restrict inference to verified users and approved applications.Risk #3: model leakage of intellectual assetsModel leakage—or model extraction—happens when an attacker interacts with a deployed model in ways that allow them to reverse-engineer its structure, logic, or parameters. Once leaked, a model can be cloned, monetized, or used to bypass the very defenses it was meant to enforce. For businesses, this means losing competitive IP, compromising user privacy, or enabling downstream attacks.For developers and MLOps teams, the challenge is securing deployed models in a way that balances performance and privacy. If you're exposing inference APIs, you’re exposing potential entry points—but with the right controls and architecture, you can drastically reduce the risk of model theft.Mitigation and hardeningEnforce rate limits and usage quotas on all inference endpoints.Monitor for suspicious or repeated queries that indicate model extraction attempts.Implement model watermarking or fingerprinting to trace unauthorized model use.Obfuscate models before deployment using quantization, pruning, or graph rewriting.Disable or tightly control any model export functionality in your platform.Sign and verify inference requests and responses to ensure authenticity.Integrate security checks into CI/CD pipelines to detect risky configurations—such as public model endpoints, export-enabled containers, or missing inference authentication—before they reach production.Solution integration: native security integrationIntegrate model validation, packaging, and signing into CI/CD pipelines.Serve models from encrypted containers or TEEs, with minimal runtime exposure.Use container and image scanning tools to catch misconfigurations before deployment.Centralize monitoring and protection with tools like Gcore WAAP for real-time anomaly detection and automated response.How investing in AI security can save your business moneyFrom a financial point of view, the use of AI and machine learning in cybersecurity can lead to massive cost savings. Organizations that utilize AI and automation in cybersecurity have saved an average of $2.22 million per data breach compared to organizations that do not have these protections in place. This is because the necessity for manual oversight is reduced, lowering the total cost of ownership, and averting costly security breaches. The initial investment in advanced security technologies yields returns through decreased downtime, fewer false positives, and an enhanced overall security posture.Challenges aheadWhile securing the AI lifecycle is essential, it’s still difficult to balance robust security with a positive user experience. Rigid scrutiny can add additional latency or false positives that can stop operations, but AI-powered security can avoid such incidents.Another concern organizations must contend with is how to maintain current AI models. With threats changing so rapidly, today's newest model could easily become outdated by tomorrow’s. Solutions must have an ongoing learning ability so that security detection parameters can be revised.Operational maturity is also a concern, especially for companies that operate in multiple geographies. Well-thought-out strategies and sound governance processes must accompany the integration of complex AI/ML tools with existing infrastructure, but automation still offers the most benefits by reducing the overhead on security teams and helping ensure consistent deployment of security policies.Get ahead of AI security with GcoreAI workloads introduce new and often overlooked security risks that can compromise data integrity, model behavior, and intellectual property. By implementing practices like zero-trust architecture, encrypted inference, and native security integration, developers can build more resilient and trustworthy AI systems. As threats evolve, staying ahead means embedding security at every phase of the AI lifecycle.Gcore helps teams apply these principles at scale, offering native support for zero-trust AI, encrypted inference, and intelligent API protection. As an experienced AI and security solutions provider, our DDoS Protection and AI-enabled WAAP solutions integrate natively with Everywhere Inference and GPU Cloud across 210+ global points of presence. That means low latency, high performance, and proven, robust security, no matter where your customers are located.Talk with our AI security experts and secure your workloads today

Flexible DDoS mitigation with BGP Flowspec cover image

Flexible DDoS mitigation with BGP Flowspec

For customers who understand their own network traffic patterns, rigid DDoS protection can be more of a limitation than a safeguard. That’s why Gcore supports BGP Flowspec: a flexible, standards-based method for defining granular filters that block or rate-limit malicious traffic in real time…before it reaches your infrastructure.In this article, we’ll walk through:What Flowspec is and how it worksThe specific filters and actions Gcore supportsCommon use cases, with example rule definitionsHow to activate and monitor Flowspec in your environmentWhat is the BGP Flowspec?BGP Flowspec (RFC 8955) extends Border Gateway Protocol to distribute traffic filtering rules alongside routing updates. Instead of static ACLs or reactive blackholing, Flowspec enables near-instantaneous propagation of mitigation rules across networks.BGP tells routers how to reach IP prefixes across the internet. With Flowspec, those same BGP announcements can now carry rules, not just routes. Each rule describes a pattern of traffic (e.g., TCP SYN packets >1000 bytes from a specific subnet) and what action to take (drop, rate-limit, mark, or redirect).What are the benefits of the BGP Flowspec?Most traditional DDoS protection services react to threats after they start, whether by blackholing traffic to a target IP, redirecting flows to a scrubbing center, or applying rigid, static filters. These approaches can block legitimate traffic, introduce latency, or be too slow to respond to fast-evolving attacks.Flowspec offers a more flexible alternative.Proactive mitigation: Instead of waiting for attacks, you can define known-bad traffic patterns ahead of time and block them instantly. Flowspec lets experienced operators prevent incidents before they start.Granular filtering: You’re not limited to blocking by IP or port. With Flowspec, you can match on packet size, TCP flags, ICMP codes, and more, enabling fine-tuned control that traditional ACLs or RTBH don’t support.Edge offloading: Filtering happens directly on Gcore’s routers, offloading your infrastructure and avoiding scrubbing latency.Real-time updates: Changes to rules are distributed across the network via BGP and take effect immediately, faster than manual intervention or standard blackholing.You still have the option to block traffic during an active attack, but with Flowspec, you gain the flexibility to protect services with minimal disruption and greater precision than conventional tools allow.Which parts of the Flowspec does Gcore implement?Gcore supports twelve filter types and four actions of the Flowspec.Supported filter typesGcore supports all 12 standard Flowspec match components.Filter FieldDescriptionDestination prefixTarget subnet (usually your service or app)Source prefixSource of traffic (e.g., attacker IP range)IP protocolTCP, UDP, ICMP, etc.Port / Source portMatch specific client or server portsDestination portMatch destination-side service portsICMP type/codeFilter echo requests, errors, etc.TCP flagsFilter packets by SYN, ACK, RST, FIN, combinationsPacket lengthFilter based on payload sizeDSCPQuality of service code pointFragmentMatch on packet fragmentation characteristicsSupported actionsGcore DDoS Protection supports the following Flowspec actions, which can be triggered when traffic matches a specific filter:ActionDescriptionTraffic-rate (0x8006)Throttle/rate limit traffic by byte-per-second rateredirectRedirect traffic to alternate location (e.g., scrubbing)traffic-markingApply DSCP marks for downstream classificationno-action (drop)Drop packets (rate-limit 0)Rule orderingRFC 5575 defines the implicit order of Flowspec rules. The crucial point is that more specific announcements take preference, not the order in which the rules are propagated.Gcore also respects Flowspec rule ordering per RFC 5575. More specific filters override broader ones. Future support for Flowspec v2 (with explicit ordering) is under consideration, pending vendor adoption.Blackholing and extended blackholing (eBH)Remote-triggered blackhole (RTBH) is a standardized protection method that the client manages via BGP by analyzing traffic, identifying the direction of the attack (i.e., the destination IP address). This method protects against volumetric attacks.Customers using Gcore IP Transit can trigger immediate blackholing for attacked prefixes via BGP, using the well-known blackhole community tag 65000:666. All traffic to that destination IP is dropped at Gcore’s edge.The list of supported BGP communities is available here.BGP extended blackholeExtended blackhole (eBH) allows for more granular blackholing that does not affect legitimate traffic. For customers unable to implement Flowspec directly, Gcore supports eBH. You announce target prefixes with pre-agreed BGP communities, and Gcore translates them into Flowspec mitigations.To configure this option, contact our NOC at noc@gcore.lu.Monitoring and limitationsGcore can support several logging transports, including mail and Slack.If the number of Flowspec prefixes exceeds the configured limit, Gcore DDoS Protection stops accepting new announcements, but BGP sessions and existing prefixes will stay active. Gcore will receive a notification that you reached the limit.How to activateActivation takes just two steps:Define rules on your edge router using Flowspec NLRI formatAnnounce rules via BGP to Gcore’s intermediate control planeThen, Gcore validates and propagates the filters to border routers. Filters are installed on edge devices and take effect immediately.If attack patterns are unknown, you’ll first need to detect anomalies using your existing monitoring stack, then define the appropriate Flowspec rules.Need help activating Flowspec? Get in touch via our 24/7 support channels and our experts will be glad to assist.Set up GRE and benefit from Flowspec today

Securing AI from the ground up: defense across the lifecycle

As more AI workloads shift to the edge for lower latency and localized processing, the attack surface expands. Defending a data center is old news. Now, you’re securing distributed training pipelines, mobile inference APIs, and storage environments that may operate independently of centralized infrastructure, especially in edge or federated learning contexts. Every stage introduces unique risks. Each one needs its own defenses.Let’s walk through the key security challenges across each phase of the AI lifecycle, and the hardening strategies that actually work.PhaseTop threatsHardening stepsTrainingData poisoning, leaksValidation, dataset integrity tracking, RBAC, adversarial trainingDevelopmentModel extraction, inversionRate limits, obfuscation, watermarking, penetration testingInferenceAdversarial inputs, spoofed accessInput filtering, endpoint auth, encryption, TEEsStorage and deploymentModel theft, tamperingEncrypted containers, signed builds, MFA, anomaly monitoringTraining: your model is only as good as its dataThe training phase sets the foundation. If the data going in is poisoned, biased, or tampered with, the model will learn all the wrong lessons and carry those flaws into production.Why it mattersData poisoning is subtle. You won’t see a red flag during training logs or a catastrophic failure at launch. These attacks don’t break training, they bend it.A poisoned model may appear functional, but behaves unpredictably, embeds logic triggers, or amplifies harmful bias. The impact is serious later in the AI workflow: compromised outputs, unexpected behavior, or regulatory non-compliance…not due to drift, but due to training-time manipulation.How to protect itValidate datasets with schema checks, label audits, and outlier detection.Version, sign, and hash all training data to verify integrity and trace changes.Apply RBAC and identity-aware proxies (like OPA or SPIFFE) to limit who can alter or inject data.Use adversarial training to improve model robustness against manipulated inputs.Development and testing: guard the logicOnce you’ve got a trained model, the next challenge is protecting the logic itself: what it knows and how it works. The goal here is to make attacks economically unfeasible.Why it mattersModels encode proprietary logic. When exposed via poorly secured APIs or unprotected inference endpoints, they’re vulnerable to:Model inversion: Extracting training dataExtraction: Reconstructing logicMembership inference: Revealing whether a datapoint was in trainingHow to protect itApply rate limits, logging, and anomaly detection to monitor usage patterns.Disable model export by default. Only enable with approval and logging.Use quantization, pruning, or graph obfuscation to reduce extractability.Explore output fingerprinting or watermarking to trace unauthorized use in high-value inference scenarios.Run white-box and black-box adversarial evaluations during testing.Integrate these security checks into your CI/CD pipeline as part of your MLOps workflow.Inference: real-time, real riskInference doesn’t get a free pass because it’s fast. Security needs to be just as real-time as the insights your AI delivers.Why it mattersAdversarial attacks exploit the way models generalize. A single pixel change or word swap can flip the classification.When inference powers fraud detection or autonomous systems, a small change can have a big impact.How to protect itSanitize input using JPEG compression, denoising, or frequency filtering.Train on adversarial examples to improve robustness.Enforce authentication and access control for all inference APIs—no open ports.Encrypt inference traffic with TLS. For added privacy, use trusted execution environments (TEEs).For highly sensitive cases, consider homomorphic encryption or SMPC—strong but compute-intensive solutions.Check out our free white paper on inference optimization.Storage and deployment: don’t let your model leakOnce your model’s trained and tested, you’ve still got to deploy and store it securely—often across multiple locations.Why it mattersUnsecured storage is a goldmine for attackers. With access to the model binary, they can reverse-engineer, clone, or rehost your IP.How to protect itStore models on encrypted volumes or within enclaves.Sign and verify builds before deployment.Enforce MFA, RBAC, and immutable logging on deployment pipelines.Monitor for anomalous access patterns—rate, volume, or source-based.Edge strategy: security that moves with your AIAs AI moves to the edge, centralized security breaks down. You need protection that operates as close to the data as your inference does.That’s why we at Gcore integrate protection into AI workflows from start to finish:WAAP and DDoS mitigation at edge nodes—not just centralized DCs.Encrypted transport (TLS 1.3) and in-node processing reduce exposure.Inline detection of API abuse and L7 attacks with auto-mitigation.180+ global PoPs to maintain consistency across regions.AI security is lifecycle securityNo single firewall, model tweak, or security plugin can secure AI workloads in isolation. You need defense in depth: layered, lifecycle-wide protections that work at the data layer, the API surface, and the edge.Ready to secure your AI stack from data to edge inference?Talk to our AI security experts

3 ways to safeguard your website against DDoS attacks—and why it matters

DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks are a type of cyberattack in which a hacker overwhelms a server with an excessive number of requests, causing the server to stop functioning correctly and denying access to legitimate users. The volume of these types of attacks is increasing, with a 56% year-on-year rise recorded in late 2024, driven by factors including the growing availability of AI-powered tools, poorly secured IoT devices, and geopolitical tensions worldwide.Fortunately, there are effective ways to defend against DDoS attacks. Because these threats can target different layers of your network, a single tool isn’t enough, and a multi-layered approach is necessary. Businesses need to protect both the website itself and the infrastructure behind it. This article explores the three key security solutions that work together to protect your website—and the costly consequences of failing to prepare.The consequences of not protecting your website against DDoS attacksIf your website isn’t sufficiently protected, DDoS attacks can have severe and far-reaching impacts on your website, business, and reputation. They not only disrupt the user experience but can spiral into complex, costly recovery efforts. Safeguarding your website against DDoS attacks is essential to preventing the following serious outcomes:Downtime: DDoS attacks can exhaust server resources (CPU, RAM, throughput), taking websites offline and making them unavailable to end users.Loss of business/customers: Frustrated users will leave, and many won’t return after failed checkouts or broken sessions.Financial losses: By obstructing online sales, DDoS attacks can cause businesses to suffer substantial loss of revenue.Reputational damage: Websites or businesses that suffer repeated unmitigated DDoS attacks may cause customers to lose trust in them.Loss of SEO rankings: A website could lose its hard-won SEO ranking if it experiences extended downtime due to DDoS attacks.Disaster recovery costs: DDoS disaster recovery costs can escalate quickly, encompassing hardware replacement, software upgrades, and the need to hire external specialists.Solution #1: Implement dedicated DDoS protection to safeguard your infrastructureAdvanced DDoS protection measures are customized solutions designed to protect your servers and infrastructure against DDoS attacks. DDoS protection helps defend against malicious traffic designed to crash servers and interrupt service.Solutions like Gcore DDoS Protection continuously monitor incoming traffic for suspicious patterns, allowing them to automatically detect and mitigate attacks in real time. If your resources are attacked, the system filters out harmful traffic before it reaches your servers. This means that real users can access your website without interruption, even during an attack.For example, a financial services provider could be targeted by cybercriminals attempting to disrupt services with a large-scale volumetric DDoS attack. With dedicated DDoS protection, the provider can automatically detect and filter out malicious traffic before it impacts users. Customers can continue to log in, check balances, and complete transactions, while the system adapts to the evolving nature of the attack in the background, maintaining uninterrupted service.The protection scales with your business needs, automatically adapting to higher traffic loads or more complex attacks. Up-to-date reports and round-the-clock technical support allow you to keep track of your website status at all times.Solution #2: Enable WAAP to protect your websiteGcore WAAP (web application and API protection) is a comprehensive solution that monitors, detects, and mitigates cyber threats, including DDoS layer 7 attacks. WAAP uses AI-driven algorithms to monitor, detect, and mitigate threats in real time, offering an additional layer of defense against sophisticated attackers. Once set up, the system provides powerful tools to create custom rules and set specific triggers. For example, you can specify the conditions under which certain requests should be blocked, such as sudden spikes in API calls or specific malicious patterns common in DDoS attacks.For instance, an e-commerce platform during a major sale like Black Friday could be targeted by bots attempting to flood the site with fake login or checkout requests. WAAP can differentiate between genuine users and malicious bots by analyzing traffic patterns, rate of requests, and attack behaviors. It blocks malicious requests so that real customers can continue to complete transactions without disruption.Solution #3: Connect to a CDN to strengthen defenses furtherA trustworthy content delivery network (CDN) is another valuable addition to your security stack. A CDN is a globally distributed server network that ensures efficient content delivery. CDNs spread traffic across multiple global edge servers, reducing the load on the origin server. During a DDoS attack, a CDN with DDoS protection can protect servers and end users. It filters traffic at the edge, blocking threats before they ever reach your infrastructure. Caching servers within the CDN network then deliver the requested content to legitimate users, preventing network congestion and denial of service to end users.For instance, a gaming company launching a highly anticipated multiplayer title could face a massive surge in traffic as players around the world attempt to download and access the game simultaneously. This critical moment also makes the platform a prime target for DDoS attacks aimed at disrupting the launch. A CDN with integrated DDoS protection can absorb and filter out malicious traffic at the edge before it reaches the core infrastructure. Legitimate players continue to enjoy fast downloads and seamless gameplay, while the origin servers remain stable and protected from overload or downtime.In addition, Super Transit intelligently routes your traffic via Gcore’s 180+ point-of-presence global network, proactively detecting, mitigating, and filtering DDoS attacks. Even mid-attack, users experience seamless access with no interruptions. They also benefit from an enhanced end-user experience, thanks to shorter routes between users and servers that reduce latency.Taking the next steps to protect your websiteDDoS attacks pose significant threats to websites, but a proactive approach is the best way to keep your site online, secure, and resilient. Regardless of your industry or location, it’s crucial to take action to safeguard your website and maintain its uninterrupted availability.Enabling Gcore DDoS protection is a simple and proven way to boost your digital infrastructure’s resiliency against different types of DDoS attacks. Gcore DDoS protection also integrates with other security solutions, including Gcore WAAP, which protects your website and CDNs. These tools work seamlessly together to provide advanced website protection, offering improved security and performance in one intuitive platform.If you’re ready to try Gcore Edge Security, fill in the form below and one of our security experts will be in touch for a personalized consultation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest industry trends, exclusive insights, and Gcore updates delivered straight to your inbox.